Commentaires récents
Gail Honeyman
That is such a mood, I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to …
Behemouth Effluvium
(I think some of my comments got cut off, you might have to hover your …
Behemouth Effluvium
I dunno if you're gonna read this but you're on the right track! Learning how …
Behemouth Effluvium
2) Start trying to group letters and short words together. At 50 wpm, you probably …
Behemouth Effluvium
3) As you're typing a word, start reading ahead at the next word. This will …
Plus
English
Français (French)
Español (Spanish)
Português (Portuguese)
Italian (Italiano)
Svenska (Swedish)
Deutsch (German)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
हिंदी (Hindi)
Pусский (Russian)
Dansk (Danish)
বাংলা (Bengali)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Eestlane (Estonian)
ελληνικά (Greek)
čeština (Czech)
Polish (Polski)
Hrvatski (Croatian)
Română (Romanian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
한국어, 조선어 (Korean)
Türkçe (Turkish)
中文 (Chinese)
Suomi (Finnish)
српски језик (Serbian)
Українська мова (Ukrainian)
norsk språk (Norwegian)
српски језик (Hebrew)
schweizerdeutsche sprache (Swiss-German)
नेपाली (Nepali)
ภาษาไทย (Siamese)
Lingua Latina (Latin)
ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱞᱤ (Santali)
日本語 (Japanese)
henokh's citations
A. Papoulis
There is no conflict between causality and randomness or between determinism and probability if we agree, as we must, that scientific theories are not discoveries of the laws of nature but rather inventions of the human mind.